The pH of a substance, as you probably remember, measures the acidity or basicity of a solution.
Clean water —is usually 7 or neutral, if it is pure — whereas polluted water often a pH that is either more acidic or more alkaline.
Water grows polluted from a number of sources — pathogens, like bacteria or parasites, organic and inorganic chemicals, from detergents to pesticides and industrial waste, and also physical changes, such as a change in temperature from industrial sources.
These changes can also alter the pH of water – either making it too alkali or too acidic. Natural ‘healthy’ rainwater is supposed to have a neutral pH of 7 and most rainwater now is between 5 and 6.
Industrial plants emit acidifying gases such as sulphuric oxides and carbon monoxide, which can change the pH of the rain water to 4 or below. This is why rain with this artificially lowered pH is often referred to as ‘acid rain’.
Certain polluting organisms such as algae, on the other hand, can make the water too alkaline.
So an obvious target, when trying to clean up polluted water, is to change pH. We already have evidence that pH is very responsive to intention. Dr. Melinda Connor, director of the Karen Connor Optimal Healing Research program and a scientist who has worked with Dr. Schwartz at the Laboratory for Advances in Consciousness and Health at the University of Arizona, has designed pH experiments to test the ability of experienced healers to change pH.
When I spent time with her at the ISSSEEM conference last June she told me that she has created a particular protocol she asks highly experienced healers to use that can lower pH by several units — more or less permanently.
So I wondered: can ‘ordinary’ intenders make this happen too?
We have some evidence that pH is highly responsive to intention from the work of former Stanford University physicist William Tiller. Tiller has conducted what are some of the most extraordinary studies about the power of intention.
Using a simple black box, the size of a remote control, with an electrically erasable, programmable, read-only memory (EEPROM) component, he has ‘charged’ these devices with human intention and then used them to affect a variety of chemical processes. His experiment rests on the unthinkable assumptions that thoughts can be imprisoned in a bit of electronic memory and later ‘released’ to affect the physical world.
In the late nineties, Tiller gathered together experienced meditators, had them all enter a deep meditative state, and asked them to embed the equipment with a highly specific intention to affect a particular target.
Each time Tiller chose experimental targets that could show a genuine, measurable change, including water pH.
He chose to see if intention can change the pH of water because water pH remains fairly static and tiny changes of one-hundredth or even one-thousandth of a unit on the pH scale can be measured; a change of a full unit or more on the pH scale would represent an enormous shift that was unlikely to be the result of an incorrect measurement.
In both instances, his meditators imprinted intentions into the black boxes to change the pH of water both up and down by a full pH unit.
Shipped to another lab
Tiller would then wrapped the imprinted black box, or the ‘Intention-Imprinted Electronic Device’, in aluminium foil and placed it in another Faraday cage until ready for shipping. On separate days he shipped each box via FedEx to the Minnesota laboratory, some 1500 miles away.
Tiller also prepared an identical control box that had not been ‘imprinted’ with intention by wrapping it in aluminium foil and placing it in an electrically grounded Faraday cage, in order to screen out electromagnetic frequencies of all magnitudes.
He had been careful to blind the experiment so that his lab technicians would not know which device contained the intention and which the control when the two devices arrived.
In the water experiments, the meditators were successful; their intentions managed to change the pH up and down by one unit.
Conditioned space
After three months, Tiller noticed that the results of his studies began to improve; the more he repeated the experiment, the stronger and quicker the effects.
He then did some investigations to try to find if there were any aspects of the laboratory that might be responsible.
After discovering that the air temperature appeared to be going up and down according to a regular rhythm or oscillation, dipping and climbing at regular intervals, Tiller then measured the pH of water in the lab and measured its capacity to conduct electricity.
He observed the same phenomenon as he had with the temperature: periodic oscillations of at least one-quarter of a unit on the pH scale, and regular dips and peaks in the water’s ability to conduct electricity.
Tiller was especially intrigued by the changes in pH. The acid/alkaline balance in any substance is highly sensitive to change; if the pH of a person’s blood shifts up or down by just a half a pH unit, it means that they are dying or already dead.
Energetic harmony
A pattern was developing: as the temperature of the air rose, the pH fell, and vice versa, in near perfect harmonic rhythm. The water’s electrical conductivity showed a similar harmonic cycle. Somehow his lab was beginning to manifest different material properties, almost as if it were a specially charged environment.
The effects also continually increased. No matter which experiment he carried out, the longer the imprinted devices were in the room, the larger the rhythmic fluctuations of the temperature and pH.
These fluctuations remained unaffected by the opening of doors or windows, the operation of air conditioners or heaters, and even the presence or movement of humans or objects around their immediate vicinity. When he compared graphs of air and water temperature readings, they again mapped in perfect harmony.
Every corner of the room that was measured registered the same result. Each aspect of the physical space appeared to be in some sort of rhythmic, energetic harmony.
Human intention captured in Tiller’s little black boxes were somehow ‘conditioning’ the spaces where the experiments were carried out.
After the imprinted boxes had been turned on for a while, the effect became relatively ‘permanent’; the target, whether water pH, ALP or fruit flies, would continue to be affected even if the device was not in the lab.
Although this influence decayed very slowly over time, Tiller’s laboratories appeared to have undergone some long-term thermodynamic transformation. The energy from intention appeared to ‘charge’ the environment and create a domino effect of order.
The constant replaying of ordered thoughts seemed to be changing the physical reality of the room, and making the quantum virtual particles of empty space more ‘ordered’. And then, like a domino effect, the ‘order’ of the space appeared to assist the outcome of the experiment. Carrying out the intentions in one particular space appeared to enhance their effects over time.
Our Water into Wine experiment
So affecting pH of water can have many extraordinary implications. On January 30, we’re going to attempt to make water more acidic, but in future, we’ll try the reverse.
Let’s all see if we can use our thoughts to bring the water back to basics.
So to join us Saturday, January 30, 2010, at 5 pm GMT (12 noon Eastern Standard time). And don’t forget to register: www.thecleanwaterexperiment.com.
Facebook Comments
Please tell me which one of your books has the intention program you mentioned in this email. Thanks,
Tiller's experiments open all sorts of possibilities...
I wonder if tv's and computers have a residue from the images/information they broadcast?
This blog has inspired me to consider the types of energy I condone around me (through different media), for it's possible staying power.
After reading the Intention Experiment I thought for best results of an intention we should be away from all electrical influences. To be a part of the water into wine intention am I not supposed to be in front of my computer to receive directions?
We do Mudra Vikas in India.. Which alters the energy field of the living room ... Which actually lasts for more than an Year . But the effects were not Measured as Tiller’s experiments. Even I am Intrigued and will be privileged if someone is willing to measure its actual effectiveness.
I was skeptic on these things ... but Tiller’s experiments made me a believer ...
thanks for this wonderful post !
We seen to keep proving this over and over again. in 1986 Psychic Discoveries Behind the Iron Curtain talked of such things. Can we do it? Absolutely. The only limitation is for those who refuse to believe.
To whoever it is that reads this - with gratitude:
My name is Sandra- we haven't met yet, but I thank you for all you're doing in the world, and for reading this email. I am a Certified Instructor under Dr. Emoto, and am thrilled that water is being honored as it is in your work. Thank you.
I've been following most of the recent blog posts about the experiments, and have read some of the articles discussing the results of various ones. And the January 30 experiment has got my attention - in a big way. There is something that is coming through very strongly about it, and I thank you for allowing me to communicate it.
It has to do with the structure of the experiment - namely, the intention to "turn water into wine."
I understand that, because we start with a glass of water and wish to end up with a glass of wine, the transformation process is receiving focus.
However.
Ultimately, intentions are movement toward an end condition. The reason they are so powerful is because we often focus on the steps we take to get to an end, and neglect to give the endpoint itself a strong focus. So this process has great value - I know this; I live it in my life. But they can be even more powerful.
The clearer the vision of the desired condition - especially when shared among more than one person - the stronger the focus, the better the results.
We can introduce clarity and simplicity to this experiment, thus:
After thanking the water, initially, we release it entirely - and focus only on wine. Purely. Completely. With all of our imaginative power - and, aided by holding a glass of wine, sniffing a glass of wine, tasting a glass of wine while we do it, if necessary - we PONDER wine.
And more.
I would recommend that we agree on the type of wine. We will be harnessing and directing the thoughts of - what, thousands? - of people - who might all have a different variety in mind when they think wine- or might wonder about which one it will turn out to be - or wonder about the pH factor... etc., etc. We can cut through all of that, and apply our inordinately powerful directed consciousnesses to a single pattern of energy - say, a glass of rich, ruby-red, leggy cabernet sauvignon. We can saturate our intent with the sensory experience of a warm, smoky, slightly acidic sip of a rich, ruby-red, leggy cabernet. We can fill ourselves and our thoughts and our feelings with these images, all at the same time, all directed toward the glass of water that is the sample, immerse ourselves in the imagined experience of wine for the time of the experiment, give it our ALL in our creative attention... and then the water, sentient, aware, and a
mission-partner in this story, will have no choice but to reflect that.
Water mirrors. Our energy is like light, and the watery universe we live in acts like a mirror - and light in front of a mirror creates a reflection. The clearer the light, the clearer the reflection. You've seen the water crystal images where samples were shown photos? If you look, the crystals end up reflecting the image. The elephant photo creates a crystal that has a center like a trunk. The dolphin photos have centers which appear like the neural net which is the magnificent dolphin's brain. The cherry blossom trees create crystals with million of tiny, beautiful 'leaves.'
So.
It is not normally my way to interfere in what others are doing that they believe in - because trust is such an important element in this creative game of life. But I couldn't quiet this insistent thought - it's been weeks and it hasn't left me. I'm trusting that it's for a reason, and throwing it out there to do its work. I do thank you for listening, and I do admire and appreciate this whole community of pioneering, loving souls, and all that is being done. Please know that, above all... I am grateful.
Sandra Gabriele
Hi Lynne,
I’ve posted about Tiller’s hosted-intention devices both on my blog and in the Intention Experiment community forum during the past few months.
You can watch a video of William Tiller and download his white paper on this device here - http://curtischappell.com/blog/archives/886 - but I assure you it is not light reading!
Tiller is also selling these devices, and you can get a link to his site here - http://curtischappell.com/blog/archives/921
I think most people simply don’t accept this stuff works, but as you show in your book and post, there are measurable effects happening from the use of intention-hosted devices!
The question is what would you do with one if you had it?
Regarding the effect of intention on PH, Babbitt did some really intriguing research on the effects that various frequencies of sunlight (colors) have on water; this science is called chromotherapy.
I wonder if thinking not only of increasing or decreasing the PH level, but using color within your thoughts, might also have an effect?
Write On!
Sandra is right
It is important to be very,very specific
Look at EFT (emotional freedom technique)
Keshin - the book is The Intention Experiment--a great read!
The only limitation is for those who refuse to believe?
This is not about belief, this is science. Dr. Tillers experiments are published and you can repeat the experiment yourself. The "simple black box, the size of a remote control, with an electrically erasable, programmable, read-only memory (EEPROM) component" is not expensive as electronic devices go. You can get one for $250 and repeat the experiment yourself. As A C Clark said, "Magic is just a technology we don't yet understand".
Hi Sundance
Well, in that case, if you say it is ONLY an experiment, why don't you have lets say 10 or 100 people focusing on making wine from water in experiment A.
And in experiment B you have lets say 10 or 100 people focusing on making wine from water AND with the addition of 10 or 100 people focusing on making the water in experiment B into water or changing the content of the "wine" back into water.
Sundance, IF the human intention cannot be interfered with by other humans intentions, i.e. DISBELIEF, then this experiment might be a cool experiment to follow.
Cheers
Jesper Nilsson, cert Access Consciousness facilitator
Hmmm... forgot an interesting thing
What else is possible?
What other experiments can follow from this?
It seems to me that this experiment is confusing. Lynne explains the objective is to reduce the water ph, which is simple to concentrate on and easily measurable.
But the title Change water into wine is another affair and this has for instance confused Sandra who advises us to focus on wine, even a specific wine.
Clearly to me it is necessary for the validity of the results to change the title and focus on ph variation.
From another Sandra:
I agree-this is a mixed message between ph and water-to-wine. Confusing. It is too late to change the titles, but I am going to try and encourage participation in my blog, twitter, etc.
May I also suggest some clarity on this web site when it comes to registering and getting information for the upcoming experiments. It discourages people when there is not a "GO HERE" link. also, the experiments page has blank bullets for results. It makes it hard to recommend participation. I suggest a good comb-through of the site before the next experiment.
See you all Saturday to change water into wine...or change ph...or whatever they put up on the screen on Saturday.
In peace,
Sandra
Follow up note:
also, the clear water page says "change the ph of polluted water" which is another mixed message-we're starting with dirty water? Not exactly the image of turning regular water into wine. I think the title and pitch for this experiment is misleading; perhaps we should allow Dan Brown to be the dramatic one and carry on with our work.
Hello, the other Sandra
I loved your posts.
There is some poetic and scientific mixture which makes me unconfortable with this research !
Anyway I am anxious to participate to-morrow. Just to lower the ph of water.
With love
Michel
Hi Lynne,
I’ve posted about Tiller’s hosted-intention devices both on my blog and in the Intention Experiment community forum during the past few months.
You can watch a video of William Tiller and download his white paper on this device on my site…search on ‘intention device’ - but I assure you it is not light reading!
Tiller is also selling these devices, and you can get a link to his site on my site…search on ‘intention device’
I think most people simply don’t accept this stuff works, but as you show in your book and post, there are measurable effects happening from the use of intention-hosted devices!
The question is what would you do with one if you had it?
Regarding the effect of intention on PH, Babbitt did some really intriguing research on the effects that various frequencies of sunlight (colors) have on water; this science is called chromotherapy.
I wonder if thinking not only of increasing or decreasing the PH level, but using color within your thoughts, might also have an effect?
Write On!
Hari -
what are Mudra Vikas - and where can I read more?
Thanks...
Natalie ,
Mudra Vikas is not a commercial stuff that is available to all. I personally came across this from a friend of mine and was told that the difference in the temperaments is due to the influence of the energy field from that particular spot, practicing tat would bring the energy field to a harmony. If you are intrigued,I will reach the source and shall get you a writeup about this. please send me a mail regarding ur interest.
-hari.poy@gmail.com
Would love to receive your newsletters. Please add me to your list.
Thanks
i'm interested in purchasing or making a similar EEPROM unit as described in The Intention Experiement.
Sundance mentions that you can buy one. Can anyone direct me to where?
Is this a commonly used component?
If i remember correctly from the book, the unit included a quartz crystal. How was it attached?
If anyone can assist me, I'd love to know.
dear lynn,
water can be made more acidic by spraying.
it is a reaction with CO2 involving carbolic acid.
you can read more about this by punching in DEIONISED DEMINERALISED WATER CHEMICAL TANKERS
-- and also -
pH FOR THE CHEMICAL TANKERMAN
in google search.
brgds
CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
..
reputable mexican pharmacies online: buying from online mexican pharmacy - mexican mail order pharmacies