CONNECT WITH LYNNE:

Urge to kill

On September 6th, 2019

When forming visualizations to heal an illness like cancer, most people believe you need a good-vs-evil battle in your head.

Bernie Siegel, Dr Carl Simonton, and Australian psychiatrist Ainslie Meares, all early proponents of visualization, encouraged patients to use vivid forms of mental imagery to enhance their healing.

The majority of the cancer patients who first made use of visualization techniques imagined a battlefield, on which good (the patient) is pitted against evil (the cancer), with the cancer patient possessing the larger weapon.

Some patients imagined their white blood cells as an army killing the cancer cells or a ‘tap’ containing the blood that feeds the cancer cells, which they can turn off.

Others have visualized themselves as participating in a violent video game.

When Simonton first introduced this technique to his patients in the 1970s, Pac-Man was the most popular video game of the time. He encouraged his patients to imagine a little Pac-Man inside their bodies, gobbling up cancer cells in its path.

But whatever the particulars of the imagery, the intention itself needed to be murderous; the patient had to want to annihilate the enemy.

Killing with thoughts

American researcher Dr John Kmetz decided to test the effect of negative intention on cancer. Although he could not test his theory on a live human being, he settled for a sample of cervical cancer cells, and enlisted Matthew Manning, a gifted British healer.

Manning sent negative intentions either by touching the beaker of cells or from a distance, inside an electromagnetically shielded room. Kmetz then used special equipment to count how many cancer cells were in the culture medium.

Ordinarily, a cancer cell, which has a positive charge, will grasp the side of a plastic beaker, attracted to its negative electrostatic charge. An injury to the cell will cause it to drop off the side and into the culture medium.

Kmetz’s equipment demonstrated that Manning had fatally injured the culture. Manning’s extraordinary healing ability had been turned on its head; in this study he had become a killing machine.

Although negative intention appears capable of disrupting the most fundamental biological processes when precisely targeted, one study suggests that healing does not necessarily require negative intention.

Leonard Laskow, an American gynaecologist and healer, was recruited by American biologist Glen Rein to test the most effective healing strategy for inhibiting the growth of cancer cells.

In his own practice, Laskow believed in establishing an emotional connectedness with his subject – even with cancer cells – before sending out healing.

Rein prepared five different Petri dishes containing identical numbers of cancer cells and then asked Laskow to send out a different intention while holding each one. Laskow’s first intention was that the natural order be reinstated and the cells’ growth rate return to normal.

With the next Petri dish, he was to adopt a Taoist visualization that entails imagining that only three of the cancer cells remained in the Petri dish. For the third dish he was not to have an intention, but simply to ask God to have His will flow through Laskow’s hands.

He offered unconditional love to the cancer cells of the fourth dish, which involved meditating on a state of love and compassion, much as Davidson’s Buddhists had done.

For the final dish of cancer cells, Laskow carried out his only truly destructive intention, by visualizing the cells dematerializing, either going into the light or the ‘void’.

Rein gave Laskow a choice of imagery largely because he was uncertain which visualization would be most effective in obliterating something.

Was it more effective to release an entity by offering it an endpoint (the light), or simply to give it a full range of potential (the void)?

As a yardstick of Laskow’s effectiveness, Rein would measure the amount of radioactive thymidine absorbed by the cancer cells – an indicator of the growth rate of malignant cells.

The most powerful images

Laskow’s various intentions had quite different effects. The most powerful were asking the cells to return to the natural order, which inhibited the cancer cells’ growth by 39 per cent.

Acquiescing to God’s will with no specific request was about half as effective, inhibiting the cells, by 21 per cent, as was the Taoist visualization.

An unconditional acceptance of the way things were had no effect either way, nor did imagining the cells dematerializing. In these two instances, the problem may have been that the thought was simply not focused enough.

In a follow-up study, Rein asked Laskow to limit himself to two possibilities, the Taoist visualization and a request for the cells to return to the natural order.

This time, he achieved an identical result with both intentions; the cancer cell growth was inhibited by 20 per cent.

The strongest effect of all occurred when he combined the two approaches, mixing an intention to return to the natural order while imagining only three cells left; his rate of cell inhibition doubled, to 40 per cent.

Clearly the combination of asking the universe to restore order while imagining a specific outcome exerted a powerful effect.

Rein asked Laskow to repeat this combined approach, but to target the medium in which the cancer cells grew, rather than the cells themselves.

Laskow achieved the same result as when he had focused directly on the cells themselves.

Finally, Rein instructed Laskow to hold each of his five states of mind in turn while grasping one of five vials of water, which would later be used to make up the tissue-culture medium of the cancer cells.

The water treated with the ‘natural-order’ intention again had the greatest effect, inhibiting the growth of the cancer cells by 28 per cent. In this case, water apparently ‘stored’ and transferred the intentions to the culture medium and on to the cancer cells.

The most effective healing intention had been framed as a request, combined with a highly specific visualization of the outcome, but not necessarily a destructive one.

With healing, the most effective approach may not be to destroy the source of the illness, but, as with other forms of intention, to put in a specific request then move aside, let go of the outcome, and allow a greater intelligence to fulfil your request.

Comments

comments

6 responses to “Urge to kill”

  1. Mike says:

    As we're all one, we're all working toward our higher source, even at, and beyond the molecular level. So intending for natural order, for all, with a specific outcome seems to me to be a win-win for all! Good stuff, thank you!

  2. Douglas Scott says:

    The findings of Rein/Laskow fall very much in line with Co-Creative Science as developed by Machaelle Small Wright founder of Perelandra Center for Nature Research which is based on integrating the involutionary input of nature (order, organization, and life vitality) with the evolutionary dynamic (direction and purpose) of man. Nature then is always facilitating a return to balance of all forms. In this case microbes and their host environment, us. While Perelandra’s work is extensive and been ongoing since the early ‘80 it’s Microbial Balancing Program addresses this cancer/host imbalance. A short introduction to Perelandra’s work would be the forward to the Perelandra Garden Workbook by Dr. Albert Schatz who discovered the antibiotic Streptomycin. All life it appears is accompanied by an electrical component and it is short circuits if you will in that system which result in microbe or host deviation and which flower essences address. That electrical repair is founded on horizontal healing directed co creatively by human and Nature consciousness. Exciting times of advancement indeed. Thank you for your contribution.

  3. Janice Marsh says:

    Thank you, Lynne, for this article which has been a big help to me to understand more of the dynamics of intention and that through understanding can be more effective.

  4. J.Michael Palka says:

    Lynne, throughout my life the Universe has usually delivered (on it's timeline) some amazing things. I am a HUGE fan of yours and have read "The Field" at least 40 times. It is my go to book for some solace in a crazy world. I have also been a student of Quantum Physics for decades.
    So this morning I talked to my brother who told me he was diagnosed with a cancer spot on his lung. A couple hours later I received your email on the visualization experiment on cancer cells. Hmmm.
    I have been an advocate of visualization for at least 50 years. I started at age 18 with TM and later to Silva Mind Control and as a Dale Carnegie trainer used it extensively. I even built my imaginary place(over 50 years ago) where I go and invite persons from the past, present and future to discuss any number of issues. And there are other amazing tools there also.
    Always enjoy your emails. Thanks for all you do Lynne. May you enjoy a Healthy and Long Life.

  5. It’s incredible how the more we come to know the easier it all becomes. A simple intention with focused result seems to produces the best outcome. Perhaps if everyone had a focused intention upon rising each day ‘I am Well in every way’ we would no longer suffer from any chronic illnesses.

  6. Terri says:

    I Love You 💕
    Thank You

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BUY NOW AT AMAZON!
  • Recent Posts

  • Archives

  • Unit 9, Woodman Works, 204 Durnsford Rd
    London SW19 8DR.

    You can connect with Lynne via Laura Ortiz: laura@wddty.co.uk

    You can speak to Customer Services at:
    +44 (0)208 944 9555

    Privacy Policy
    shopping-carttwitter-squarefacebook-squareinstagram

    Lynne McTaggart