This article from our recent issue of What Doctors Don’t Tell You, written by Bryan Hubbard, is so important that I wanted to share it with you. It has new evidence about the vaccine and the mRNA technology plus ways to rid your body of any lingering effects.
Big Pharma has seen the future, and it’s called mRNA. The technology—which was first rolled out on a global scale to counter the Covid-19 virus—will be used to develop new vaccines and to combat a range of diseases, including cancer.
It’s been recognized by drug regulators as a new class of drug, and the rewards will be staggering, generating revenues that no other industry has ever achieved. The drug industry currently generates around $1.7 trillion every year, a phenomenal sum that has accelerated with the launch of weight-loss drugs.
But these figures will be dwarfed by the revenues that mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) technology will attract. Oliver Watson at Imperial College London has estimated that mRNA cancer vaccines alone could generate anything from $5 trillion upward, and with 11 versions producing promising results in early-stage trials, they could top $38 trillion over a few years.
To put that into perspective, the tax revenues collected by all governments in the developed world total around $20 trillion a year.
Last summer’s decision by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to end around $500 billion of funding for 22 trials of mRNA technology will be merely a small bump in the road as other countries ramp up research programs.
But the HHS’s reasons are salutary: In a statement it announced that, according to the data, “these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like Covid and flu.”
Critics have pointed out that mRNA vaccines aren’t vaccines in the usual sense because they provide the instructions to produce parts of a virus within our own cells, whereas conventional vaccines expose the immune system to a weakened version of the whole virus. These “vaccines” also don’t prevent infection or spread, which became apparent during the Covid pandemic.
Safety last
But it’s been the safety of mRNA that has raised the most concerns. The Health Service Executive, Ireland’s health agency, has estimated one in every 10,000 people who get a Covid shot suffer a serious adverse reaction, including myocarditis and pericarditis. These two types of heart tissue inflammation have been reported mostly in young men (HSE, “Side Effects and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines,” Sept 16, 2025, 2.hse.ie)
There have also been cases of thrombosis, heart attack and stroke, and arrythmia (irregular heartbeat), which could be the results of strange microclots that have been detected in the blood after vaccination (Vaccines [Basel], 2022; 10(8): 1267)
The clots form into sticky webs known as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and have also been noted by pathologists during autopsies of people who died following a Covid infection.
Excess NET formation can cause serious—and even fatal—inflammatory and clotting problems, including severe infections, autoimmune diseases, cancer, diabetes and arthritis. A cluster of microclots can also block tiny blood vessels and reduce oxygen flow, researchers from Stellenbosch University in South Africa have noted (J Med Virol, 2025; 97(10); e70613).
Overall, it appears the mRNA technology can cause “a myriad of cellular and molecular problems,” and the full consequences of that manipulation are being underestimated, said Karina Whitehouse at the Autonomous University of Querétaro in Mexico.
Hide the facts
But with such glittering prizes within reach, drug companies have been committing obfuscation and even fraud in their research to get their mRNA offerings over the line. Inconvenient data has gone missing, deaths have gone unreported and whole cohorts who didn’t respond to the vaccine or unfortunately died have disappeared.
The most egregious example happened last autumn when Pfizer published data from mRNA flu jab trials in phase 3—the stage before full approval—and gave itself a gold star. In the study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Pfizer researchers tested their mRNA offering on around 18,000 healthy adults aged 18–64, half of whom were given the conventional flu shot.
They reported that the mRNA jab delivered “statistically superior efficacy” compared to the seasonal flu shot and demonstrated an “acceptable safety profile.” Yes, 16 participants in the published study died during the trial, but their deaths were nothing to do with either vaccine, the researchers said (New Engl J Med, 2025; 393(20): 2001–11).
The whole study—its analysis, conclusions and structure—was dismantled by scientists and other research analysts within days after publication.
The first red flag was the age groups selected for the study: The over-65s, the group most affected by flu, had been omitted. But they were in the official data that Pfizer delivered to the US National Library of Medicine’s Clinical Trials database, and they represented more than 60 percent of the group given Pfizer’s mRNA flu jab, as would be expected for any flu shot (Pfizer, ID NCT05540522, May 8, 2025, clinicaltrials.gov).
Here come the old
With the over-65s back in the frame, the results changed, and the supposed safety of the jab, seen in younger people, disappeared. Healthy older participants—free of any acute or chronic disease—who had the mRNA jab were at greater risk of serious adverse reactions, including kidney failure and acute respiratory problems.
Compared to those who had the seasonal jab, those given the mRNA version had a 7 percent greater risk of death and almost twice as many suffered non-serious adverse reactions. The mRNA group also had a 185 percent greater risk of acute respiratory failure that could be fatal. Overall, 49 of the older people given the mRNA shot died, compared to 46 who had the seasonal jab.
The mRNA jab not only had a higher risk profile but was also less effective: Those who received it were around 6 percent more likely to get the flu.
But when there’s the chance to make astonishing sums that have never been seen before, the truth—and the safety of the public—take a back seat.
How to get rid of the spike proteins from the mRNA jabs
A leading cardiologist has developed a protocol that is designed to help people shed spike proteins from the mRNA Covid-19 jabs.
Dr Peter McCullough, chief scientific officer with the Wellness Company in Florida, says that three natural substances—nattokinase, bromelain and curcumin—can work together to help the body clear the spike protein from cells and tissues.
Nattokinase – 100mg dose twice a day,
Bromelain – 500mg daily
Curcumin -500mg twice a day.
Each has been scientifically proven to eliminate the spike proteins, he says. “Out of all the therapies I have used in my practice and among all the proposed detoxification agents, I believe nattokinase and related peptides hold the greatest promise for patients at this time.”
To see more about this and other articles about Covid, check out: wddty.com
